Islam for all-الإسلام للجميع

هل تريد التفاعل مع هذه المساهمة؟ كل ما عليك هو إنشاء حساب جديد ببضع خطوات أو تسجيل الدخول للمتابعة.
Islam for all-الإسلام للجميع

Ruling on mu’allaq hadeeth Aya10
Questo sito e' protetto con
Norton Safe Web


    Ruling on mu’allaq hadeeth

    الحلاجي محمد
    الحلاجي محمد
    Servo di Allah


    Sesso : ذكر

    Numero di messaggi : 6995

    عالمي Ruling on mu’allaq hadeeth

    مُساهمة من طرف الحلاجي محمد السبت 31 يوليو - 16:58:01

    Ruling on mu’allaq hadeeth 432128

    Ruling on mu’allaq hadeeth


    .............................................
    Firstly:

    A mu’aallaq (lit. suspended)
    hadeeth is one in which one or more narrators are omitted from the
    beginning of its isnaad by the muhaddith who compiled the book.

    Al-Haafiz ibn Hajar (may Allaah have mercy on him) said in Nuzhat al-Nazr (108-109):

    Among the forms of mu’allaq hadeeths are:

    Where the entire isnaad is omitted, so it says for example: The Messenger of Allaah Ruling on mu’allaq hadeeth Saws (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said…

    Where the entire isnaad is omitted and only the name of the Sahaabi or the names of the Sahaabi and Taabi’i are left.

    Where the name of the one who narrated it is omitted and it is attributed to someone who came above him (in the isnaad).
    COLOR="red"]End quote.[/Ruling on mu’allaq hadeeth Collapse_tcator]
    [


    Secondly:

    Every hadeeth which is mentioned in the books with the isnaad omitted and which is attributed to the Prophet Ruling on mu’allaq hadeeth Saws(peace
    and blessings of Allaah be upon him), without being attributed to any
    of the books of Sunnah, is a mu’allaq hadeeth. If the hadeeth has an
    uninterrupted isnaad (mawsool, lit. connected) in the books of Sunnah,
    or the compiler who narrated it as a mu’allaq report has given the
    uninterrupted isnaad elsewhere in his books, then it seems that the one
    who quoted it as a mu’allaaq report did so only for the sake of brevity,
    and describing it as mu’allaq does not mean that it is regarded as
    da’eef (weak). There is no dispute on this point among the scholars.

    You will come across this a great deal in Saheeh al-Bukhaari.

    Al-Haafiz Ibn Hajar (may Allaah have mercy on him) said in al-Nukat (1/325):

    If the hadeeth has only one isnaad, or it includes a number of rulings
    and needs to be repeated, then in that case he may quote only the text
    of the hadeeth, or may shorten the isnaad. End quote.

    Al-Suyooti said in Tadreeb al-Raawi (1/117):

    Most of the reports of this type in al-Bukhaari appear with the full
    isnaad (mawsool) elsewhere in his book, but he narrated them in mu’allaq
    form for the sake of brevity and so as to avoid repetition. End quote.

    Thirdly:

    The ruling on a mu’allaq hadeeth is – as in the case of any other hadeeth – that it is essential to Ruling on mu’allaq hadeeth Collapse_tcatlect and examine all its isnaads. After that, the ruling must be one of the following:

    1 – If we cannot find an isnaad for it in any book, then in that case
    the ruling is that the hadeeth is da’eef (weak), because nothing is
    known about the narrators who have been omitted from the isnaad; some of
    them may be weak or liars.

    For example: al-Haafiz Ibn ‘Abd al-Barr narrated in a mu’allaq report that the Prophet Ruling on mu’allaq hadeeth Saws(peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: “There
    is no Muslim who passes by the grave of his brother whom he knew in
    this world, and greets him with salaam, but Allaah restores his soul to
    him so that he may return the greeting.”


    The scholars researched this mu'allaq report but they could not find an
    isnaad for it in any book. Everyone who mentioned it quoted it from the
    mu’allaq report of Ibn ‘Abd al-Barr, so basically it is a da’eef
    hadeeth, but some scholars regarded it as saheeh, following Ibn ‘Abd
    al-Barr who narrated it as a mu’allaq report but classed it as saheeh.

    2 – If we find the hadeeth with an uninterrupted (mawsool) isnaad in
    another book of hadeeth, then in that case we have to examine the
    isnaad, and we judge it on the basis of the principles that the scholars
    have set out for examination of hadeeth. In judging the status of a
    mu’allaq report we may also the methodology which is stated in the books
    of Sunnah, as follows:

    Fourthly:

    Some of the scholars have their own methodologies of quoting mu’allaq
    hadeeth, which were either stated by the scholar himself or defined
    after him by other scholars who studied his books and examined his
    methods.

    From what the scholars have said about the methodology of Imam
    al-Bukhaari in narrating mu’allaq reports, we can divide his mu’allaq
    reports (of which there are one hundred and sixty) into two categories:

    1- Those which were narrated in a decisive form, such as saying “He narrated…” and so on.

    The ruling on these mu’allaq reports is that they are saheeh or hasan,
    because it is not possible for him to state that in a decisive form
    unless it was saheeh in his view. Rather there are some reports which
    meet his conditions but he reported them in mu’allaq form.

    The scholars made an exception from this principle in the case of just
    one hadeeth, which is reported in mu'allaq form in the Book of Zakaah
    (2/525):

    Tawoos said: Mu’aadh (may Allaah
    be pleased with him) said to the people of Yemen: Bring an item of
    clothing, a shirt or other garment as zakaah instead of barley and corn;
    it will be easier for you, and better for the companions of the Prophet
    Ruling on mu’allaq hadeeth Saws(peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) in Madeenah.

    They said: The isnaad as far as Tawoos is saheeh, but Tawoos did not hear it from Mu’aadh.

    2- Those which are narrated as mu’allaq in a “defective” form, such as saying “It was narrated,” “it was said” etc.

    Some such reports may be saheeh or hasan, and they may be reported as
    mu’allaq because he did not narrated them word for word, rather he
    narrated the meaning.

    They may also be slightly weak (da’eef), and the narrator may point out the weakness by saying “it is not saheeh.”

    (Summarized from al-Nukat by al-Haafiz Ibn Hajar (1/343-345); Tadreeb al-Raawi by al-Suyooti (1/117-121)


    With regard to Saheeh Muslim:

    There are only five mu’allaq reports in this book, which Imam Muslim
    narrates with one full isnaad, then after that he narrates them as
    mu’allaq reports with an isnaad other than the one that he gave in full,
    for an academic purpose that Imam Muslim wanted to achieve. They have
    been compiled by Shaykh Rasheed al-Deen al-‘Attaar in an essay that has
    been published, in which he explains their sources and saheeh isnaads.

    After the Introduction, there is no mu’allaq report in Saheeh Muslim for which he does not give a different isnaad elsewhere, except for one hadeeth. Muslim said in hadeeth no. 369:

    Al-Layth ibn Sa’d narrated from Ja’far ibn Rabee’ah from ‘Abd al-Rahmaan
    ibn Hormuz from ‘Umayr the freed slave of Ibn ‘Abbaas that he heard him
    say: ‘Abd al-Rahmaan ibn Yasaar, the freed slave of Maymoonah, the wife
    of the Prophet (Ruling on mu’allaq hadeeth Saws), and I came to Abu’l-Jahm ibn al-Haarith ibn al-Simmah al-Ansaari. Abu’l-Jahm said: The Messenger of Allaah (Ruling on mu’allaq hadeeth Saws) came from the direction of Bi’r Jamal and was met by a man who greeted him with salaam. The Messenger of Allaah (Ruling on mu’allaq hadeeth Saws) did not return the greeting until he went to a wall and wiped his face and hands, then he returned the greeting.

    See: al-Nukat by al-Haafiz Ibn Hajar (1/346-353)

    This hadeeth is found with the uninterrupted isnaad via al-Layth ibn
    Sa’d in Saheeh al-Bukhaari (337) and Abu Dawood (329), and elsewhere.

    And Allaah knows best.

      الوقت/التاريخ الآن هو الأحد 28 أبريل - 19:14:19